@eyedeekay
&eche|on
&kytv
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+StormyCloud
+T3s|4
+acetone
+dr|z3d
+hagen
+lbt
+orignal
+postman
+segfault
+wodencafe
Arch
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest25394
Irc2PGuest30976
Irc2PGuest52859
Irc2PGuest59134
Irc2PGuest99152
Nausicaa
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over1
Sisyphus
Sleepy
SoniEx2
T3s|4__
aeiou
anon2
b3t4f4c3
bak83
boonst
cumlord
dickless
eyedeekay_bnc
mareki2p
not_bob_afk
poriori
profetikla
qend-irc2p
r3med1tz
radakayot_
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
weko_
x74a6
T3s|4
o/ zzz - I'm really impressed by the amount of effort you've devoted to ssu2 evaluation, given the still 'limited' number of routers involved in testing. Are we still far too early from your POV to enable ssu2 by default for several releases, or are you planning a randomized, slower roll out (i.e. 5-10% of routers ssu2 enabled by default, with an opt-out option), beginning with
T3s|4
1.8.1 (aka 0.9.55)? Would obtaining a far larger ssu2 'tester' router/user base help you in the next release?
zzz
T3s|4, no decisions made yet, we're going to discuss it at the next meeting in #ls2 next Monday, 6:30 PM UTC, if you'd like to join us
T3s|4
noted, and thanks zzz