#i2p-dev (irc2p) | 2.7.0-2

zzz worked for me, as reported

dr|z3d yeah, minor in the scheme of things. restart of router will probably fix.

UDP Do you guys know if the wrapper.java.maxmemory flag in wrapper.config scales automatically with the bandwidth set upon first setup? I've had to modify it manually on a couple machines since I have a rather fast internet connection, and it would just keep crashing after 4-5 minutes.

obscuratus UDP: Yep, you have to set that manually in the wrapper.config

UDP Seems like it runs out of heap memory with the default value, so just wondering.

UDP ah gotcha, that's good to know since that doesn't seem to be covered on the website's basic install steps, and I was trying to figure it out :p

UDP thanks

UDP got 3-4 nodes running so far, one's done a few terabytes this week

UDP gonna go get some food, but gonna lurk on here a bit :)

Opicaak It appears like the network is back to normal, for now.

dr|z3d like I said to zzz earlier, Opicaak, just because the view from where you are looks ok, it doesn't mean that's the same everywhere. attack isn't hitting all routers at once.

eche|off hm, memory footprint did went up, some routers did died of 256 MB java heap memory as of OOM, to bad

zzz you'll be at the meeting today right eche|off ?

zzz first report of OOMs, thanks

eche|off with 2.0.1 it was.

zzz 2.1.0?

eche|off I try to be, need to check if I can get into with laptop. still system broken :_/

eche|off 2.1.0, latest ubunti

eche|off (sorry, currently no dev build until system is rebuild...)

zzz what else? fast router? slow? floodfill? any services on it?

eche|off 1 service on it, mde-fast router, defaultiung to 500kb/sec, else default, reachable via IPv4 and IPv6

eche|off 80% share

zzz ok. did it restart ok by itself and come back up?

eche|off by default ~2k active peers

eche|off it did restart itself ~10 times and went of later on

eche|off restart after 3-5 min of being active

zzz ok

eche|off mostly kademlia datastorejobs I see in the out of heap memory errors

zzz good to know, expected it but did not have any reports yet

zzz will have a package of fixes later in the week

eche|off ok

zzz workaround 1, increase max mem in wrapper.config of course

zzz workaround 2, when stopped, just delete all but a thousand or so of your RIs

eche|off just 9k

eche|off in netDB

eche|off ah, 19k in peerProfile

eche|off so, default alue is bad in these situations

eche|off interstingly the bigger oney do have low numbers now, but guess they are rated low on most peers

eche|off which shows the net does work

zzz not_bob, did you resolve the snark recheck-every-startup issue from my forum and if so how? symlinks? plus bug?

dr|z3d pfft. plus bug my aspidistra.

dr|z3d that would be in the same category as the double leaseset I2P+ jeopardy bug.

dr|z3d aka canon bug.

not_bob zzz: Sometimes it does it now, and other times it does not. I have no idea why.

not_bob zzz: If I do a bad shutdown it does a re-checke very time.

not_bob It has nothing to do with symlinks.

dr|z3d running it with i2pd on the backend, no, not_bob?

not_bob Yes

dr|z3d could be session data's not being given enough time to write to disk before shutdown..

not_bob i2pd backend.

not_bob My fleet is mostly i2pd at this point due to low memory.

zzz ok, thx for update

zzz just asking

not_bob No worries. The re-checking at start isn't that big of a deal. It just takes a while.

not_bob I have just shy of 2 TB or torrents loaded on one router.

dr|z3d my money's on session data being corrupted on shutdown.

zzz probably a shutdown thing, yeah. not corruption, just not getting it all done

zzz before the router gives up waiting

dr|z3d right, same thing really, if the data's not all written in time, then on startup it's, well, corrupted :)

dr|z3d rotating the save points could mitigate that. so you maintain 2, current and last.

zzz not_bob, try stopping i2psnark at the same time you click graceful shutdown, should fix it

dr|z3d if current's not good, rollback to last.

not_bob Next time I restart that server I'll give it more time before I tell it to restart.

not_bob zzz: I'll try that and report back later.

zzz it's not corrupt drz, just didn't get the new one written, so the files are newer than the timestamp in the old one

dr|z3d why would files be newer if they're already downloaded and are seeding, assuming we're talking about the content here, and not the metadata?

zzz right, only if incomplete

dr|z3d so, not_bob's probably is a TB of completed torrents all wanting to do the integrity check dance on startup.

dr|z3d *problem

dr|z3d that's why I'm suggesting the config/metadata is being corrupted on shutdown.

not_bob Yeah, almost all of my torrents are done and just there to upload to others.

zzz it's also very hard to corrupt a config file because of the way we do it:

zzz save to x.tmp then rename to x

eyedeekay Hi everybody, sorry I'm late, got disconnected right before the meeting

eyedeekay 1. Hi

eyedeekay 2. 2.1.0 Status Report

eyedeekay 3. 2.2.0 Development Status

eyedeekay 4. Congestion Throttling

eyedeekay 5. Hypothetical Traffic Management ( Flood of Tor Users)

eyedeekay 6. Stickers for translators

eyedeekay zzz where do you want to do your report about the DOS? 2 or own topic?

zzz let's call it 3b)

zzz or 2b)

zzz your choice

eyedeekay OK 2b then

zzz hi

eyedeekay 1. Hi who all is here today besides me and zzz?

not_bob Here

echelonMAC here

obscuratus Hi

echelonMAC on replaement system.

eyedeekay Great turnout, thanks everybody

zzz irc is laggier than usual so please allow a little extra time for responses

eyedeekay 2. 2.1.0 Status Report

eyedeekay Thanks zzz I will keep that in mind

eyedeekay Where to even start... my focus has been on Android UX issues in particular fixing up things I was doing wrong when initializing the app

eyedeekay Android will get a point release on that account

eyedeekay The topic I'm sure is on everybody's mind right now is the network being under attack which has shifted everybody's attention

eyedeekay And that is topic 2b

eyedeekay Shoot I mixed up the topics, scratch that, that was supposed to go to 3. sorry, long week, lot going on

eyedeekay zzz would you do me a favor to take 2? I think I am ill-equipped to present on everything which is going on

zzz sure

zzz but before I do

zzz do you and echelonMAC have a 2.1.0 mac easy-install bundle progress report?

eyedeekay Oh yes I can do that

echelonMAC in short: eyedeekaym did redo the signing script, I can buiodl and sign, but still wrong signing for apple

eyedeekay So, we've been closing in on issues, and right now echelonMAC and have different hypothesis on what's going on which we're both pursuing

eyedeekay My hypothesis is that this all stems from a stale workaround for a bug in Java 14

eyedeekay Where jpackage is supposed to sign the dylib files that are packed into a disk image(dmg) but which are in fact left unsigned

eyedeekay zab worked around this by creating the .app directory and signing the stuff inside it then using jpackage only for the final packaging step

eyedeekay so when we upgraded Java's we started signing everything twice, and we no longer needed to do that signing step manually

eyedeekay echelonMAC correct me if I'm wrong but you think you have the wrong sort of keys?

echelonMAC maybe, maybe not, unsure about that

echelonMAC at least the logs showing this error

zzz my question was higher level, what's the ETA, is 2.1.0 still a target or has that been abandoned and you're hoping for 2.2.0, or what?

echelonMAC 2.1.0 is stioll the target, but currently no ETA

echelonMAC I can buidl nearly instant, but digging deeper is currently out of time...

eyedeekay I still want to cut a release of 2.1.0 as soon as we know we can pass notarization, IMO once we can pass it once we should be able to do it predictably

zzz eyedeekay more or less committed to early april 2.2.0 in his blog post, you're not endorsing that ETA echelonMAC ?

echelonMAC I am completely helpless and cant predict a ETA, as I do not full yunderstand signing and building yet.

echelonMAC more or less, I do follow scripts blindly, if idk can fix the signage, the notarization is a 5 min job.

echelonMAC IF the sign does work as appple expect it

zzz ok then I recommend an edit of the blog post eyedeekay, let's not promise things we can't deliver on

eyedeekay Will do

zzz ok thanks you ready for my part of 2) ?

eyedeekay Yes please

zzz great

zzz last meeting was one week after the release, now we're 4 weeks out

zzz my hope was that expl. build success would climb steadily

zzz from the low-20% to low-30%, and then "pop" out of congestion, back to low 40s

zzz only the first part happened

zzz and then we swung back and forth between low 20s and low 30s

zzz so, we have some theories, see 2b)

zzz but I'm happy with the performance of 2.1.0 otherwise

zzz not too many bug reports

zzz I'll give an overview of what we are fixing in 2b) and 3)

zzz about 50% of the network has updated to 2.1.0 or the i2pd equivalent

zzz everybody please update if you haven't

zzz that's all I have for 2a), but I'll pause for a minute for questions / comments before starting 2b)

zzz ok, 2b) current network conditions

zzz over the weekend started an unambiguous attack

zzz lots of floodfill routers

zzz for the most part, the network overall, and java routers, are handling it ok

zzz I do have one report of routers crashing with OOM (out of memory)

zzz I understand that i2pd routers are really strugging with very low tunnel build success rates

not_bob My fleet is up to date.

zzz the attack is starting / stopping / changing several times a day

zzz so we're only about 60 hours in to understanding it and discussing countermeasures

zzz remember the tunnel build problem (now much more likely to be classified as a different attack) started Dec. 19 and took us several weeks to understand and address

zzz so it's early days

not_bob I have one I2P+ router and it's done well to weather this. But, my i2pd routers not so much. I've seen as low as 3% tunnel build success. I'm currently sitting around 10% on those routers.

zzz but this is a straightforward sybil / DHT attack, new to us but familiar to anybody doing peer-to-peer / DHT applications

zzz far too early to say if it will require a release ahead of schedule (for java i2p) or if so when

zzz EOT, I'll wait a couple minutes for discussion / comments / questions

eyedeekay Should people who wind up OOM increase the RAM available to their router?

zzz yeah, that's a straightforward mitigation

zzz stop your router, edit wrapper.config, restart

zzz I expect I'll have mitigations in dev builds in a few days

eyedeekay As I mistakenly stated before, my focus has been on Android UX issues in particular fixing up things I was doing wrong when initializing the app, pretty basic stuff all things considered but all of which was due for improvement

eyedeekay or outright fixing

eyedeekay Examples being fixes for subscriptions and custom ports when building tunnels which got in several user's way after a large increase in users with 2.10

dr|z3d as an aside, and to shine some light on the size of the attack, we've got a user reporting ~30K banned routers. so it's non-trivial :)

dr|z3d (that'll be shiver, who's here)

mark22k I got 56005 banned peers.

moristo Is this the work of a nation state--the banned routers or any other noticable patten?

eyedeekay Holy moley. I have 11027 and I thought that was a lot

moristo Spectrum internet was off yesetrday in FL and Italy the day before.

moristo *yesterday.

zzz let's get back to 3) please and table further attack discussion until after the meeting

echelonMAC Banned Peers (57053)

moristo oh, is there a meeting in progress? My bad.

zzz eyedeekay, you still with us?

eyedeekay yeah I'm here

zzz you have more on 3) or is it my turn?

eyedeekay started a long one:

eyedeekay i2p.firefox(Easy-Install for Windows is also getting worked on, more of the work is being done by removal there, updates are getting simplified now that the old admin-style installs are all migrated to user-style installs

eyedeekay portable USB install support is on the horizon for 2.2.0

eyedeekay With updates

eyedeekay Other issues and user-complaints I'm addressing or deciding how to address are on that issue tracker

eyedeekay EOT for me

zzz ok you saw the NPE issue in i2p.i2p right?

eyedeekay Yes I did, hot on the trail

zzz ok holler if you need help ofc

zzz 3) for me:

zzz I finished the peer selection refactor I've been working on since september, finally

zzz I think I fixed the erroneous symmetric nat indications that were in 2.1.0, but need somebody with that problem to test and report

zzz got a cool new i2psnark search box

zzz almost done with "congestion caps" (proposal 162)

echelonMAC :-)

zzz and some more tweaks to refine our handling of tunnel build congestion

zzz late last week, I thought I was pretty much done with 2.2.0 and could relax for two months until the release

zzz so, unfortunately, now we have a lot more to do

zzz that's the way it goes sometimes

not_bob Thank you for that, a major quality of life improvement.

zzz EOT, I'll wait a minute for discussion, then back to you eyedeekay

zzz haha not_bob you're welcome

eyedeekay Last call for 3?

eyedeekay 4. Congestion Throttling - I think this was a tunnel_king topic, is tunnel_king here?

zzz back to you eyedeekay

eyedeekay 4. Congestion Throttling, 5. Hypothetical Traffic Management ( Flood of Tor Users) - both introduced by tunnel_king, last call for tunnel_king

eyedeekay OK last one, 6. Stickers for translators

eyedeekay Specifically rules for people receiving stickers outside of the Americas

zzz this was my topic, only because unresolved since last meeting

zzz echelonMAC you have an answer?

echelonMAC not en detail, but who wnats should receive a bunch of stickers if they sent their address

echelonMAC aka sned a announcement in transifex and send out after receive of address

echelonMAC but currently no new stickers arrivced here

eyedeekay Tracking says the 10th

zzz I'm awaiting echelonMAC to post the instructions on my forum, then I will copy/paste to transifex

echelonMAC ok

zzz that's where we've been for a month

zzz thanks

zzz EOT on 6) for me, back to you eyedeekay

eyedeekay Anything else for 6 or for the meeting?

zzz one closing word for the meeting: zzz.i2p the best place for news and weather, I'll post there when I know more than I do now

zzz thanks

eyedeekay Thanks very much for that zzz, and thanks everybody for coming to the meeting

zzz thanks eyedeekay

zzz got thru it without disconnects

zzz anybody with a registered nick that wants voice, speak up before I +m

eyedeekay See you around IRC and same time next month

justmessin hey

justmessin unsure if I can speak in this channel, can anyone hear me? I was going to ask for the logs of this channel/details of the attack. I just recently started using I2P a few weeks ago but have a background in cybersecurity

obscuratus justmessin: Check major.i2p

not_bob justmessin: Logs will be posted on geti2p.net/en/meetings

eyedeekay justmessin you could look at the #ls2 channel logs on major.acetone.i2p

zzz last call for voice justmessin mark22k moristo or anybody else

justmessin hey zzz

zzz does hey mean you want voice?

justmessin could I get voice please

justmessin obscuratus not_bob eyedeekay thanks all I will check. would any devs find router stats valuable?

justmessin i just started recently with i2p this past month but i have everything open, max tunnels quite high etc

zzz welcome to i2p

zzz no we don't need stats from anybody

justmessin thank you, gonna get back to something but then i'll take a look through these logs to see if theres anything i can suggest

justmessin is this channel okay for questions about routers? i only just recently started hosting one. started with default java i2p default 1G, now using 3G. is there any problem with giving it like 32G?

not_bob justmessin: The defaults tend to work well for most people. As for more equals better? At some point it's not. And I think the max you can allocate to a jvm is 4 gigs.

justmessin not_bob thanks. just have spare cpu and bw so want to help the network

not_bob Thank you for that.

RN Thanks to the devs for the continuing efforts to unplug the toaster!