@eyedeekay
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+Stormycloud
+acetone
+anonymousmaybe
+dr|z3d
+hagen
+lance074
+mareki2p
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+snex
+weko
+wodencafe
AHOH2
Arch
BubbRubb
C341
Daddy_1
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreeB
FreefallHeavens
HowardPlayzOfAdmin
Irc2PGuest57893
Irc2PGuest60494
Irc2PGuest68785
Irc2PGuest82088
Irc2PGuest85022
Leopold_
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Sleepy
SlippyJoe
T3s|4_
Teeed
aargh
ardu
b3t4f4c3__
bak83_
cumlord
death
dr4wd3
duanin2
eyedeekay_bnc
idontpee
not_bob_afk
ohThuku1
poriori_
profetikla
r00tobo_BNC
rapidash
rascal
shiver_1
solidx66_
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
x74a6
RN
is the stat router.integratedPeers the same as displayed "Active Peers?"
obscuratus
RN: No, router.integratedPeers is the same as FloodFills.
RN
hmmm... jsonrpc doesn't agree with console...
RN
and it gives the same value for thoe
RN
those
obscuratus
RN: Are you saying router.integratedPeers is tracking "Active Peers" for your router?
obscuratus
I graph router.activePeers and router.integratedPeers for my router, and they both track with what I expect, with activePeers being what it say, and integratedPeers tracking Floodfills
RN
in the console it is fine, just what I'm getting in conky they are the same number
RN
and what conky shows is closest to active peers in console
RN
double checked a dozen times if I missnamed the function or stat or mistyped it where it is invoked
obscuratus
You've tied conky into I2P. :) Hhhhmmmm. Ok, I'm impressed.
RN
no, idk did that
RN
I'm just tinkering with it
RN
he uses lua to handle i2pcontrol/jsonrpc