@eyedeekay
&eche|on
&kytv
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+StormyCloud
+dr|z3d
+goose2_
+hagen
+orignal
+postman
+weko
An0nm0n
Arch
Danny
DeltaOreo
DiCEy1904
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest11229
Irc2PGuest48909
Irc2PGuest6753
Nausicaa
Onn4l7h
PenguinDriver
SoniEx2
T3s|4_
Teeed
acetone_
anon2
b3t4f4c3__
bak83
boonst
cumlord
dr4wd3
eyedeekay_bnc
goose2
hk
itsjustme
j6
not_bob_afk
numberwang
onon_1
poriori
profetikla
qend-irc2p
rapidash
shiver_
u5657
veiledwizard
w8rabbit
x74a6
zzz
throwback thursday
zzz
whats up
zzz
two more SSU1 removal MRs up, for next release not this one
zzz
got into it on twitter with monero, please RT
zzz
eyedeekay, I thought you said there was a i2p task on ccs.getmonero.org but I don't see it?
dr|z3d
feel free to summarize on ramble, zzz, if you want eyes on it :)
zzz
eche|off, eche|on do we have any monero we could put up on a bounty?
zzz
somebody want to write up a CCS? eyedeekay?
zzz
you could just attach your last 5 years of talks ))
zzz
monero guy: "if it's well documented it'll get funded in no time"
zzz
so we should have done that instead of flying to Lisbon?
eyedeekay
This is what I was referring to zzz bounties.monero.social/posts/32/i2p-baked-into-the-monero-gui
zzz
gah they have both bounties and CCS? but 22.2 XMR is a start
zzz
seems like in the CCS the going rate is 150-200 XMR for 3 months work
zzz
the bounty is about GUI and bundling i2pd, but I think we should push them to SAM and away from bundling
eyedeekay
Yeah I agree
eyedeekay
I'm going to see what I can do to convince them, if I can figure out where it fits into their network stack
eyedeekay
Probably easier to persuade people if I can offer them a little guidance
zzz
the guy I'm talking to on twitter is Paul Janowitz who will be at Prague
zzz
you think between the two of us we could write up a CCS?
zzz
orignal, do you support domain sockets for SAM? bitcoin is working on it: github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27375
orignal
not yet, but working on it
orignal
polistern also asked a while ago
orignal
in two words I want to implement local sockets for all client tunnels including SAM
orignal
but first I need to implement boost::stream interafce for I2P streams
orignal
yes, better to use SAM then built-in i2pd
orignal
back to local sockets, i2pd can talk to Tor as outproxy using local sockets
orignal
in the next release
zzz
ok, it seems like that PR was mainly for Tor and they just stubbed out I2P for now
zzz
I leave it to you to work with the bitcoin gang on it ))
zzz
interesting, that PR is a year old and got merged yesterday
orignal
do you support local sockets for SAM?
orignal
and yes Tor works great through local socket
zzz
no, as I said domain sockets via java is really awkward; doable in theory but not worth the trouble