IRCaBot 2.1.0
GPLv3 © acetone, 2021-2022
#i2p-dev
/2025/04/21
@eyedeekay
&Irc2PGuest88200
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+T3s|4
+dr|z3d
+eche|off
+hagen
+mareki2p
+not_bob_afk
+postman
+snex
Arch2
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest59134
Irc2PGuest59581
Irc2PGuest70083
Irc2PGuest96449
Irc2PGuest97049
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
SigSegv
Sisyphus
Sleepy
T3s|4_
acetone_
aeiou
ardu
b3t4f4c3___
bak83
boonst
cumlord
death
dr4wd3
duck
eyedeekay_bnc
onon_
orignal_
phobos
pisslord
poriori_
profetikla
qend-irc2p
radakayot_
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
weko
wodencafe2
x74a6
orignal zzz, looks like zzz.i2p doesn't like type 12
orignal or maybe my issue
zzz orignal, I have an error in the logs, probably my issue, will work on it early this week, thanks for testing
orignal let me run local tests
orignal just finished stuff today
zzz oh wait, it is your problem ))))))
zzz you set enc type in key cert to 0, not 255
orignal at least your keys are fine
orignal thanks. will fix
orignal forgot about it
orignal got it now
orignal seems working
zzz super
zzz I don't allow ElG enctype + PQ sigtype
orignal huh? isn't it 4?
orignal I connect as 4
zzz I mean in the key cert itself
zzz where it's always been 0 until now
zzz for destinations
orignal it's not about this it's becauce crypto key is occupied
zzz right, but I just have a quick sanity check to prevent 0 enctype + PQ sigtype in destination key certs, that's the error you hit
zzz actually for router identity key certs also, the proposal says that combination is not allowed
zzz 255 is required
zzz happy to hear it worked, well done ))
orignal great
orignal now it's time to implement my server side with PQ
orignal but as I said I want to change signature verification first in streaming
orignal e.g. just ignore it
orignal I'm wondering what will be LS size with ML-DSA public key, signature and ML-KEM crypto key
zzz there's a table in the proposal with the size increases listed
orignal nevermind crypto is 32 bytes
eyedeekay Flag day for gitlab/gitea in a few hours. Folks can keep using gitlab issues right up until I announce it here later today, our migration tools are excellent and can keep up with your work right up to the last minute.
zzz I've started working on a complete stat subsystem overhaul to make it simpler and more prometheus-friendly
zzz and it will make the console graphs much better
zzz I have the refid migration working, I'll await the gitea migration before putting up an MR or PR or whatever it's called over there
eyedeekay Thanks, I can handle either way but this is probably easiest
eyedeekay I'll be sending out password reset emails tomorrow
eyedeekay Well, tonight likely. But it'll be there in the morning
zzz please include some migration guidance for us users. is your ssh key changing so we have to muck with our .ssh//config? are MRs and issues coming over or must they be reentered? when is the switchover date/time, both for clearnet and i2p side?
eyedeekay All your repos, MR's, issues, comments, and public keys will be migrated automatically but the accounts are locked until the passwords are reset
eyedeekay All you and the other users of the gitlab should have to do is follow a password reset email from idki2p@mail.i2p
eyedeekay That will happen tomorrow as I said. Hidden service addresses will be migrated to the registered ones today, so you will not need to enter new addresses for the git services in-i2p
zzz ok, thanks
eyedeekay Last thing to happen will be the main DNS update and the Let's Encrypt certificate, both happening tomorrow, both should be equally non-interactive for the end users
dr|z3d zzz: re stats, multiple data points on graphs would be nice, pairs etc.. :)
eyedeekay Oh also email notifications are getting fixed with this upgrade/migration, and shouldn't break down again afterward
dr|z3d plenty of stats lend themselves to pairs, which would allow for a more condensed graph view in the console.
dr|z3d and multiple data points a la stats.i2p where applicable would also be well received, I'm sure.
zzz yeah I think I see how to get there, not for 2.9 though
zzz all the required stats and the profile stats have to stay as-is, but the full stats can be greatly simplified
zzz for the required stats we want to combine in graphs, we can probably do both flavors
dr|z3d sounds good
dr|z3d there are probably graphs where it makes sense to do pairs by default, and if one of the two stats is enabled, the complimentary stat is also enabled, to simplify things.
zzz the idea is to group them and enable as a group
dr|z3d yeah, sounds good, amounts to about the same thing.
RN are you suggesting to combine the up/down pairs? like if I graph my eepsite up/down now, or custom tunnel up/down?
RN been asking about this for a while
RN iirc the resistance was related to mucking about in some messy code, i guess the promethius stuff got you in there, eh?
RN :)
zzz well, I always had resistance to having user-configurable graph combinations because the config UI would be messy
zzz here, we'd precombine things like in/out bw into one overall stat and graph
zzz which is how prometheus likes it ("labels")
RN :)
RN I'm gonna have to play with that... I think I already grabbed the promethius plugin, just gotta set stuff up as outlined on your blog
RN but it will be nice to have the in/out all combined
RN pairwise
RN :)