IRCaBot 2.1.0
GPLv3 © acetone, 2021-2022
#i2p-dev
/2022/09/21
@eyedeekay
&kytv
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+T3s|4
+dr|z3d
+hk
+orignal
+postman
+wodencafe
Arch
DeltaOreo
FreeRider
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest15271
Irc2PGuest28511
Irc2PGuest64530
Irc2PGuest77854
Nausicaa
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over
Sleepy
Soni
T3s|4_
Teeed
aargh3
acetone_
anon4
b3t4f4c3
bak83
boonst
cancername
cumlord
dr4wd3
eyedeekay_bnc
hagen_
khb_
not_bob
plap
poriori
profetikla
r3med1tz-
rapidash
shiver_1
solidx66
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
weko_
x74a6
dr|z3d zzz: re scaling and torrents per tunnel (http://zzz.i2p/topics/3409), have you considered a configuration option to assign new tunnel every x torrents, and to further frustrate timing attacks, a random startup delay per each tunnel?
dr|z3d a new tunnel per x torrents, or max x tunnels to be shared between all existing torrents, where a torrent is randomly assigned to one of the tunnels.
zzz no. huge mess. call sponge or run multiple snarks
dr|z3d it doesn't need to be a huge mess, but I agree that one tunnel per torrent is a recipe for fail.
dr|z3d doesn't bigly allow for multiple dests per instance?
zzz bumped the 9 year old multi-snark forum post
dr|z3d tldr? "no, I'm not doing it. ever." ? :)
zzz yes it would be a mess. Trying to convince me something is easy never, ever, ever works
dr|z3d not trying to convince you of anything tbh. I know better :)
dr|z3d you vaguely touched on blinded destinations for i2psnark before I recall, is that an easier proposition?
zzz would have to get postman and parg involved so that would be a whole thing. udp trackers is before that
dr|z3d ok, you're not ruling it out then. that's good.
zzz its really hard to retrofit
zzz and udp trackers is stalled because I screwed myself
zzz originally defined it as 2 RTT protocol which is hard but coded it all
zzz then woke up one day and decided 1 RTT would be secure and ripped out all the 2 RTT code
zzz then later realized it's not that secure
zzz not even sure if I still have a copy of the 2 RTT code or what
dr|z3d ouch :|
dr|z3d if you need reminding (which I'm sure you don't), git branches are free :)
zzz still have it
dr|z3d nice, panic over!
zzz also in mtn branch from 2014
zzz anyway what's in trunk now is the 1 RTT flavor, checked in in January, "target 1.8.0" lol
dr|z3d oh well, 1.8.0 can be 2.0 :)
dr|z3d you were working on it for zzzot, no? how far did you get with that.
zzz i think that side is done and supports both 1 and 2 RTT
zzz parg said he'd do the 2 RTT flavor
dr|z3d excuse my ignorance, but what's the difference between 1 and 2? not even sure I know what RTT is in this context.
zzz see proposal 160, but basically 2 rtt is one round trip to get a token and then one for the announce. kinda like SSU2.
dr|z3d ok, thanks
zzz with datagrams you can't prove it's you unless you respond
zzz the clearnet flavor is 2 RTT but I foolishly convinced myself we didn't need it
dr|z3d oh well, live and learn, eh? :)