@eyedeekay
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+T3s|4
+dr|z3d
+eche|off
+hagen
+hk
+mareki2p
+not_bob_afk
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+snex
+wodencafe
Arch
BubbRubb1
Daddy
Daddy_1
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest44045
Irc2PGuest44301
Irc2PGuest56179
Irc2PGuest60563
Irc2PGuest92548
Leopold
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
SigSegv
Sisyphus_
Sleepy
SlippyJoe_
T3s|4_
Teeed_
acetone_
ardu
b3t4f4c3__
bak83
boonst
cumlord
death
dr4wd3_
eyedeekay_bnc
guest7621
idontpee
not_human
poriori_
profetikla
r00tobo
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
thetia
tr
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
weko_
x74a6
eyedeekay
Re: CI for izpack5 I can do it as long as I use the snapshots
dr|z3d
just an idea. fork 4, keep our own repo, hack on it.
zzz
knock yourself out. 4 is 13 years old and horribly fugly on linux. we switched to 5 for a reason
eyedeekay
Ack, it's relatively straightforward to set up as long as I don't have to build it myself in the CI pipeline
dr|z3d
4 works ok for me, better now it's got pack200 baked in, 5 was always hit and miss for me, universal installer never worked properly on all platforms.
dr|z3d
if it ain't fixed don't broke it :)
dr|z3d
or something.