~dr|z3d
@RN
@RN_
@Stormycloud
@T3s|4
@T3s|4_
@eyedeekay
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
%RTP
%ardu
%cumlord
%snex
+FreefallHeavens
+Leopold
+Xeha
+f00b4r
+hk
+nnm
+onon_
+poriori
+profetikla
+qend-irc2p
+r00tobo
+uop23ip
+weko
AHOH2
Arch
BubbRubb
Danny
DeltaOreo
HowardPlayzOfAdmin1
Irc2PGuest12940
Irc2PGuest17402
Irc2PGuest29015
Irc2PGuest5096
Meow
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
SigSegv
acetone_
anontor
halloy13412
idontpee
mareki2p_
maylay
pisslord
r00tobo[2]
rascal
shaye0
shiver_
simprelay
solidx66
thetia
u5657
woodwose
AmyMalik
had a dumb idea
AmyMalik
it's for preventing MAIL FROM forgery in i2p and tor, by providing a token system, where the recipient server would hold up the sender, contact the putative sender server's token program, ask the sender server "do you recognize this token?", and it'd give a K for yes, Z for "maybe quarantine it?" or D for no - which would then be used to decide the disposition of the message. Unlike
AmyMalik
with clearnet email, where there's an IP address, and my personal recommended action for SPF fail is to quarantine, I would recommend, for a token exchange fail, that the receiving mailer drop the message, either 4xx 4.x.x for a Z or a "you forgot to turn up your token server", or 5xx 5.x.x barred by sender policy for a D from the token server.