~dr|z3d
@RN
@StormyCloud
@T3s|4
@eyedeekay
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
%acetone
%cumlord
+DirtyHarry
+FreefallHeavens
+Xeha
+ardu
+bak83_
+mareki2p
+poriori
+profetikla
+r00tobo
+radakayot
+segfault
+uop23ip
AHON1
Arch2
Danny
DeltaOreo
Irc2PGuest30001
Irc2PGuest53192
Irc2PGuest59581
Irc2PGuest70134
Irc2PGuest96449
Meow
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
SigSegv
altonen
boonst
carried6590
duck
maylay
not_bob_afk
onon_1
phobos_
pisslord
qend-irc2p
shiver_1
simprelay
solidx66
thetia
u5657
weko_
zer0bitz
AmyMalik
had a dumb idea
AmyMalik
it's for preventing MAIL FROM forgery in i2p and tor, by providing a token system, where the recipient server would hold up the sender, contact the putative sender server's token program, ask the sender server "do you recognize this token?", and it'd give a K for yes, Z for "maybe quarantine it?" or D for no - which would then be used to decide the disposition of the message. Unlike
AmyMalik
with clearnet email, where there's an IP address, and my personal recommended action for SPF fail is to quarantine, I would recommend, for a token exchange fail, that the receiving mailer drop the message, either 4xx 4.x.x for a Z or a "you forgot to turn up your token server", or 5xx 5.x.x barred by sender policy for a D from the token server.