~dr|z3d
@RN
@StormyCloud
@T3s|4_
@eyedeekay
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
+FreefallHeavens_
+Xeha
+acetone
+bak83_
+poriori
+profetikla
+r00tobo_BNC
+snex
+uop23ip
+weko
Arch
Danny
DeltaOreo
Irc2PGuest12249
Irc2PGuest25220
Irc2PGuest66540
Irc2PGuest90883
Irc2PGuest92478
Leopold_
Meow
Nausicaa
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
aisle1
anu3
ardu
boonst
deadface
dickless
duck
enoxa
evasiveStillness
foobar_
hk
mareki2pb
maylay
not_bob_afk
orignal_
qend-irc2p
radakayot_
shiver_
simprelay
solidx66
u5657
usr001
woodwose
orignal
yes I do now
orignal
Blinded message
orignal
I don't know what's wrong if someone publishes too many introducers?
orignal
2 concerns: size of RI and 2 digits index
dr|z3d
orignal: if there's a fixed amount set in the code, and someone's going out of their way to modify the code, chances are they're up to no good.
dr|z3d
based on recent attacks, assume the worst.
dr|z3d
so I ask again, what's a reasonable amount for decent network connectivity? is there any justification for more than 5?
zzz
this whole discusssion is silly, there's no agreement necessary
zzz
it's an extensible format. It's not appropriate to put something in the spec that some undefined options are illegal
zzz
additionally, when under attack, implementations are free to use whatever heuristics they want to take whatever action they want
zzz
that also doesn't belong in the specs
dr|z3d
ok, zzz, thanks for the input :)
dr|z3d
I'm going to stick with max 5 for now before ban unless I hear a persuasive argument for increasing the toleration.