~dr|z3d
@RN
@StormyCloud
@T3s|4
@T3s|4_
@eyedeekay
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
%acetone
%cumlord
+DirtyHarry
+FreefallHeavens
+Xeha
+ardu
+bak83_
+mareki2p
+onon_
+profetikla
+r00tobo
+radakayot
+segfault
+uop23ip
AHON1
Arch2
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreeB
Irc2PGuest53192
Irc2PGuest59581
Irc2PGuest64993
Irc2PGuest70134
Irc2PGuest96449
Meow
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
b4dab00m
boonst
carried6590
duck
maylay
not_bob_afk
phobos_
pisslord
poriori_
qend-irc2p
shiver_1
simprelay
solidx66
thetia
u5657
zer0bitz_
orignal
yes I do now
orignal
Blinded message
orignal
I don't know what's wrong if someone publishes too many introducers?
orignal
2 concerns: size of RI and 2 digits index
dr|z3d
orignal: if there's a fixed amount set in the code, and someone's going out of their way to modify the code, chances are they're up to no good.
dr|z3d
based on recent attacks, assume the worst.
dr|z3d
so I ask again, what's a reasonable amount for decent network connectivity? is there any justification for more than 5?
zzz
this whole discusssion is silly, there's no agreement necessary
zzz
it's an extensible format. It's not appropriate to put something in the spec that some undefined options are illegal
zzz
additionally, when under attack, implementations are free to use whatever heuristics they want to take whatever action they want
zzz
that also doesn't belong in the specs
dr|z3d
ok, zzz, thanks for the input :)
dr|z3d
I'm going to stick with max 5 for now before ban unless I hear a persuasive argument for increasing the toleration.