IRCaBot 2.1.0
GPLv3 © acetone, 2021-2022
#saltr
/2024/12/28
~dr|z3d
@RN
@RN_
@StormyCloud
@T3s|4_
@eyedeekay
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
+Atticfire
+FreefallHeavens
+Over
+Xeha
+bak83_
+cumlord
+hk
+poriori
+profetikla
+scottpedia
+uop23ip
+weko
An0nm0n
Arch
Dann
DeltaOreo
Irc2PGuest18103
Irc2PGuest29173
Irc2PGuest46214
KiloDeltaRomeo
Leopold_
Meow
Nausicaa
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
acetone_
anon2
anu3
boonst
enoxa
mareki2pb
not_bob_afk
qend-irc2p
shiver_
simprelay
solidx66
tr
u5657
woodwose
dr|z3d minor thing, but you now have version info for your geoip db on /info
dr|z3d build date, specifically.
dr|z3d how's this for app feedback:
dr|z3d he is dont working
dr|z3d fix the problam
not_bob_afk dr|z3d: lol
dr|z3d russians everywhere, not_bob_afk!
dr|z3d that wasn't I2P+ feedback, just to make that clear. :)
eyedeekay Is somebody firing the cannons?
dr|z3d you tell us, eyedeekay..
dr|z3d maybe you "accidentally" found some more acid at monerocon? :)
eyedeekay That was HOPE lol, but I am going to ask the person I think cooked it whether I was right while I'm here :)
eyedeekay I'm pretty my issue is just because the CCC network has a gazillion people messing with it right now though
dr|z3d I'll take your word for it and pretend I know what you're talking about :)
eyedeekay ^ that's what I'm talking 'bout
eyedeekay Just watched these guy's presentation at CCC, looks very cool
dr|z3d so radicle is the new shiny? what is it?
eyedeekay P2P git with a system for communicating patches and issues in a way which is familiar to github/gitlab/gitea/forgejo users
eyedeekay this is their clearnet homepage: radicle.xyz
eyedeekay It works well enough for them to be dogfooding it too, they've archived all their repositories on centralized forges
dr|z3d looks interesting, but I don't get why it's much different to hosting your own git repo.
dr|z3d I mean, I have all the control I need without needing a p2p solution.
eyedeekay For me, it partly comes down to "no need for me to account for all the user signup issues"
eyedeekay also getting rid of onerous storage requirements for repositories I don't really want to host
dr|z3d well, good, amen to that.
dr|z3d the only things you want to host are you own stuff and i2p project stuff. anything else can get their own repo. easy. signups for the most part for reporting issues.
dr|z3d obviously it seemed like a good idea at the time to let all and sundry host projects on your repo, but, hey, we know how that turned out :)
dr|z3d updated terms and conditions for hosting: "no".
eyedeekay Yeah managing gitlab that's as heavily targeted as mine seems to be is deeply frustrating
dr|z3d gitea's a breeze, you just need to remember to run ./gitea doctor check when you've pulled updates.
eyedeekay gitea is a lot better than gitlab and I also set it up to natively support I2P through SAM
eyedeekay Pretty sure their forks inherited the change too
orignal question
orignal why does a torrent become stopped?
orignal in the middle of download
orignal snark
orignal Dec 28, 2024, 10:44:11 AM ERROR [ LXFC@qXqHEp] g.klomp.snark.PeerConnectionIn: E
orignal rror talking with LXFC@qXqHEp 6651
orignal java.lang.RuntimeException: Error writing storage (piece 793) for Squid.Game.S02
orignal Blinded message
orignal at org.klomp.snark.PeerCoordinator.gotPiece(PeerCoordinator.java:1234)
orignal at org.klomp.snark.PeerState.pieceMessage(PeerState.java:432)
orignal at org.klomp.snark.PeerConnectionIn.run(PeerConnectionIn.java:163)
orignal at org.klomp.snark.Peer.runConnection(Peer.java:321)
orignal at org.klomp.snark.PeerCoordinator$1.run(PeerCoordinator.java:822)
orignal at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
orignal at net.i2p.util.I2PThread.run(I2PThread.java:103)
orignal Caused by: java.io.IOException: Input/output error
orignal at java.base/java.io.RandomAccessFile.writeBytes0(Native Method)
orignal nevermind
orignal it's my hardrive
orignal I/O error, dev sda, sector 1614623435 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 1 prio class 0
uop23ip that's odd. had the same error lately. wasn't the drive in my case(as far i can see). 2x re-allocate, lost most data and is loading now w/o errors.
orignal my question is
orignal if snark is try to redownload failed segment
orignal in my case the drive is very old
uop23ip fs is btrfs
orignal like from 2009
orignal standard ext4
uop23ip i tried to restart it at first. it downloads some and then it stops again. tried multiply times. only 2x allocate worked. first time i had this kind of error iirc.
orignal then it needs to be fixed in snark