dr|z3d_
ok, who's running major?
acetone
for archiving chat history as public domain
RN
?
acetone
look this: major.acetone.i2p/irc2p/saltr/2021/12/05
albat
hi RN :)
RN
aloha albat
RN
what is behind that link acetone ?
acetone
RN, web interface of major bot
acetone
if you are hate public chat logging, I'll disconnect it
RN
I am not a big fan
RN
does it serve a purpose? is there an opt out mechanism?
RN
also, 'public' is a bit vague in scope
acetone
RN: push the dot in the message begin and logger ignore it (like this ". bla blah")
RN
so I would have to preface everything I type wit a period?
RN
--- Blinded message
RN
*** giggles
RN
that is a bit of an ask
RN
small, but still
RN
is it only limited to this channel?
acetone
RN: I think what this archive is good maretial for future users and i2p history
RN
and where is it 'publicly' available?
RN
let us say, hypothetically
acetone
RN: available on major.acetone.i2p and some my links in Yggdrasil Network and Tor (Tor not started yet)
RN
I don't want my nym out there, but am ok with my messages, as long as they are not linked to my nym
RN
mmmkay
RN
well, if I have the choice, I'd opt for all my messages and mentions of my nick to be replaced by something
RN
but if it is running now it is already too late
RN
I am not asking you to stop your project
acetone
So I still running this logger here or not?) I can stop it and remove any mention of this chat from history
RN
just think if a total noob comes into I2P and says things ignorantly
RN
well, what channels is it in
RN
each channel requires consent according to the rules for IRC2P
RN
as I interpret them
RN
I haven't said anything doxing myself, so I am ok so far...
RN
but you haven't answered my big questions: what channel(s) does it log.... I guess I'll have to go to the link
RN
*** falls off chair laughing at not-bob's error page
RN
*** reads "Computer says no."
RN
hahahhahahhaa
RN
thanks dr|z3d or not_bob … love the error page
acetone
lmao
acetone
RN: this logger logging
acetone
#i2p-dev
acetone
#ls2
acetone
#mail.i2p
acetone
#saltr
acetone
and some channels from irc.ilita.i2p
acetone
so "major" logging channels which I considered important for history
RN
I'm ok with those, not sure if other users are. but have you cleared that bot running with an operator in each channel?
RN
That would be polite
RN
I understand and agree with your primary assumption
RN
ugh! I just fired up a new I2P instance and need to remember how to share the susidns stuff between my older one and the new one
RN
when do the logs start?
RN
seems your eepsite is slashdotting
acetone
RN: ok, i wrote in other channel where bot also logging
acetone
logging started today
RN
ok, well if you contact an op in each channel and get consent, and advise those in the channel(s) acording to the op's requirements that sounds good to me
RN
I just worry about the new users
RN
that may not know when entering a channel that they are accidentally saying things they should not, like their router port or other identifying info
RN
Σ:Đ
RN
keep the list of channels operated in easy to find, along with the oper from the channel saying they give their consent
RN
people deploy bots without consent all the time, doing you best to do these things lets you show your transparency in motivation and helps with trust
RN
imho
acetone
RN: thanks for kind words
RN
in the case of multiple chan ops get consent from as many as you can
RN
always glad to help information be free
RN
but also as I get older, see informed consent is important
RN
let me retry and see if major will load
RN
well, this router is not well integrated yet. I will take a peek at your site later acetone
acetone
RN: ok. Web interface of bot JS free so your visit will nice
acetone
In one or bit more days I still testing system performance of "major" and he can shortly disconnecting (or reconnecting)
dr|z3d
let's see how it goes, acetone, but for future reference, when you introduce a logging bot in the channel it's polite (and network policy) to ask the channel operators first.
dr|z3d
ah, it seems zzz just brought you up to speed on policy, too. great.
dr|z3d
everyone on best behavior :)
acetone
dr|z3d: \o/ all for future users and history
RN
well, this router is not well integrated yet. I will take a peek at your site later acetone
RN
yes dr|z3d, we were discussing that
RN
at least acetone asked. They are making a good effort at doing it right
dr|z3d
*** chuckles at acetone's exuberance.
dr|z3d
acetone: one thing, which you may have noticed previously. we have an occasional offensive spammer.. if you could remove any spam from the logs, I'd be eternally grateful! :)
acetone
dr|z3d: technically it's possible because chat log is simple txt file on the server disk
dr|z3d
great, acetone. hopefully won't be needed, but who knows?
T3s|4
acetone: yep, grep for the spammer(s) - and nuke them all! ;p
curdislav
hello
curdislav
how do i prevent i2p+ from using so much data?
itsjustme
Like ram or internet data?
curdislav
internet data
curdislav
itsjustme:
itsjustme
curdislav: there is a bandwidth limit option in the console
dr|z3d
hi curdislav
dr|z3d
forget about the bandwidth limiter, the better bet is to limit the number of participating tunnels your router will host.
dr|z3d
in your router.config file in ~/.i2p/ or wherever your profile is stored in not on *nix, add the line router.maxParticipatingTunnels=2000
dr|z3d
check how many tunnels you're currently hosting, and adjust that value until your bandwidth is as you like it.
dr|z3d
also, if you're using a lot of bandwidth, it's obviously working fine for you :)
dr|z3d
if you want a simpler way to modify configs in future, add the line: routerconsole.advanced=true to your router.config file, wait for a few seconds, and then you'll be able to edit configs directly on the /configadvanced page.
dr|z3d
you'll see a congestion section appear in the sidebar when advanced mode is active.
dr|z3d
both config settings don't require a router restart to take effect.. as soon as you set the max number of participating tunnels, the router will stop hosting part tunnels until the value is met.
dr|z3d
I'm recommending limiting participating tunnels over adjusting bandwidth allocation as you'll retain your router's bandwidth class and attract traffic on that basis, which I personally prefer to lowering the router bandwidth tier.
dr|z3d
did you get my messages re bandwidth usage, curdislav?